data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56143/561431113d94a76bdcd51dab5f49e61adb0cdd85" alt="Insurgency workshop not working"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5db95/5db9567f9a000b4632e2744fbc5a3501a460b894" alt="insurgency workshop not working insurgency workshop not working"
International mechanisms-such as the UN system, and universal jurisdiction cases-can involve barriers of know-how, cost, distance, and language, meaning that they do not present a realistic option for many people. Kazakhstan, Bangladesh, the Philippines and Sri Lanka, for example, have made torture a specific offence under their domestic law, and South Africa and Uganda have specific anti-torture legislation ( REDRESS and AHRC 2013 REDRESS 2016a). Over the last three decades there has been an attempt to promote domestic legal avenues for redress on behalf of survivors of torture ( Malamud-Goti and Grosman 2006 Oette 2012 Scott 2001). The UN Convention against Torture requires that victims of torture are provided with ‘redress and … an enforceable right to fair and adequate compensation’ (Article 14).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56143/561431113d94a76bdcd51dab5f49e61adb0cdd85" alt="Insurgency workshop not working"